Sunday, January 17, 2010

Avatar is supressed so that Confucius will success


My favorite movie of the year just won the best picture from the Golden Globe (although I also think that will deserve that too). Yet, reported from Apple Daily, a newspaper from Hong Kong, the Chinese government limited the showing of this world-wide success movie to only the 3D-version (since there are limited number of cinema equipped with the facilities for showing 3D movie). The movie is a big box-office success, and had a record-making ticket-sales for 5 billion RMB in 2 weeks. The Propaganda Department requests that media should focus their report on the movie <> instead, since it's identified as the 'main melody' by the higher ranking central government officials. The article argues that there are two possible reasonse for the Chinese government to do so: 1) since it's so popular, it is over-taking the movie market from the locally-produced movie; 2) the storyline may remind audiences about forced demolition and relocation, and it encourages violent resisteance.

'main melody', according to Baidu.com, means something more than just theme or motives but also refers to 'film, television shows and other products of art that is accord with the benefit of the ruling class. Promotion of these products is usually lead by the ruling class'. The movie became part of the 'main melody' identified by the Propaganda Department in March 2009, when Hu Jintao said that 'it's about time to release a movie about Confucius'. It is described as 'a great film with singificant political, cultural, and historical meaning', and the icon to promote Chinese Confucian culture around the world.

Is becoming the tool for communist China's propaganda? This question remind me the article by Peter Foster at the Telegraph (see here) when he discusses the concept of 'propaganda' in China context. It seems to me that, according to Foster, the key difference between propaganda versus a government promotion of certain policy/ideas is depending on whether one have the right to refuse/challenge. While people in China may have the right to choose to see or not to see the movie (or simply, cannot afford to see the movie), it seems that the modern way of propagate certain idea is to limited choices.

Source: Apple Daily
Accesses date: 16 January 2010

北京捧《孔子》驅趕《阿凡達》
恐劇情惹強拆遷聯想 強勁票房危及國產片

2010年01月18日

全球熱播的荷李活巨片《阿凡達》( Avatar)在內地遭截擊。中國電影發行放映公司(中影公司)指示各地停映《阿凡達》普通版,僅放映立體版;而中共中央宣傳部(中宣部)則下令媒體不准再炒作《阿凡達》熱。據悉,當局截擊《阿凡達》有兩大原因,一是該片吸金過度,搶了國產片市場;二是影片引起觀眾對強迫拆遷聯想,並有煽動暴力抗爭之嫌。

內地接近中影公司人士昨對本報證實,中影公司近日向各地發出指示,要求在本周初撤下《阿凡達》 2D和膠片版(即普通版),僅保留 3D版繼續上映。

《孔子》將於本月 22日在內地各地同步上映。

《孔子》將於本月 22日在內地各地同步上映。

12345678910
放大圖片
《孔子》成為中共力推的主旋律影片。

《孔子》成為中共力推的主旋律影片。

12345678910

抽起 2D僅保留 3D版

因內地 3D影院不多,該指令實際是限制《阿凡達》在更大範圍繼續傳播。該人士稱,有關決定來自國家廣電總局,「可能是帶有政治性的決定。」據悉,即使是 3D版可能也只能放映三至四周。《阿凡達》是在本月四日開始在內地上映。
消息透露,中宣部近日也發出指示,要求各地宣傳主管部門管好媒體,不要再炒作《阿凡達》掀起的熱潮,並正確引導相關輿論。中宣部同時要求,媒體娛樂新聞報道重點,應轉到即將在全國上映的國產巨片《孔子》。由香港明星周潤發主演的《孔子》將於本月 22日(周五)在內地各地同步上映。
北京影評人劉毅認為,中影公司和中宣部同時出手截擊《阿凡達》,原因之一是該片在內地上映短短半個月,票房已近五億元人民幣,打破內地影片吸金紀錄;當局要扶持國產片,不想讓一部進口電影佔據太大市場份額;另外,《孔子》是獲中共高層力捧、被定為「主旋律」的獻禮影片,當局不想讓它被一部外國進口片搶去風頭。

放大圖片
《阿凡達》被指有煽動觀眾「以暴抗暴」之嫌。

《阿凡達》被指有煽動觀眾「以暴抗暴」之嫌。

12345678910
放大圖片
《阿凡達》票房強勁,已收近五億元人民幣,打破內地影片吸金紀錄。

《阿凡達》票房強勁,已收近五億元人民幣,打破內地影片吸金紀錄。

12345678910

被指煽動「以暴抗暴」

放大圖片
《阿凡達》勾起民眾被逼遷之痛。圖為上海一群被強拆的業主誓言維權。

《阿凡達》勾起民眾被逼遷之痛。圖為上海一群被強拆的業主誓言維權。

12345678910

還有消息指,中宣部下令輿論冷待《阿凡達》還有一個重要原因,就是該片挑起觀眾對強迫拆遷的聯想,甚至有煽動觀眾仿效片中情節對逼遷「以暴抗暴」之嫌。隨着影片熱播,內地互聯網出現不少相關議論,有網民直指影片「講的就是發展商和政府以開發為名,強迫搬遷的故事」,「要向納美人(片中反抗外來者強拆的外星人)學習」!
內地近年因強迫拆遷釀發悲劇不斷,居民不時以自焚或自殘等方式抗議。有網民指,《阿凡達》導演一定在中國住過,受中國社會強拆逼遷事件啟發,才想出這個故事,「唯一差別是,電影結局是有希望的,而中國被強拆的民眾只有絕望」。網民又說:「《阿凡達》是紀念釘子戶抵抗強迫拆遷的成功輓歌。」



中共力撐 圖以儒治國

2010年01月18日
北京截擊《阿凡達》原因之一,是本周將上映的國產影片《孔子》,當局一方面要扶持國產片,另一方面因《孔子》是中共總書記、國家主席胡錦濤力撐的「主旋律」影片。中共期望以孔子的儒家思想灌輸民眾,維持統治。

內地媒體披露,去年 3月全國人大會議期間,胡錦濤在江蘇團遇到全國人大代表、電影女導演胡玫。胡錦濤問:「你在做甚麼?」胡玫答:「我在拍《孔子》。」胡錦濤聞訊大悅:「哎呀,那可是一個重大的……」停頓數秒後胡錦濤說:「現在推出《孔子》,正是時候!」
正是因胡錦濤這句話,正在籌拍的《孔子》就被中宣部納入「主旋律」作品之列,譽之為中國首部「具重大政治、文化、歷史意義的巨片」,決定作為中國儒家文化思想代表在全球推廣。據悉該片製作拷貝多達 2,500個,超過建政 60周年獻禮片《建國大業》( 1,450個),更創下內地電影拷貝紀錄。
內地文化人昝愛宗指,馬列意識形態今天在中國難獲認同,中共處心積慮搬出孔子,欲以儒治國,因儒家的「忠、孝、君、臣」等觀念,十分適合中共在社會動盪之際維持統治的心態。他表示,胡錦濤對電影《孔子》的熱情及中共在全世界推廣孔子學院的做法,都是證明,「孔子與馬列格格不入,馬列哲學已徹底破產,共產黨救不了自己,要孔子救共產黨,恐怕也是毫無出路。假如孔子在世,一定討厭自己被政客所利用。」

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Left Confucianism?

Daniel Bell's new article on explaining what is Left Confucianism: http://www.viennareview.net/node/1102



What's Left of Confucianism?


by Daniel A. Bell
01/02/2009

The Chinese government's very public display of compassion and transparency in response to the devastating earthquake in Sichuan province appears to have strengthened its authority and its bonds with ordinary Chinese people. The government and army worked hand in hand with legions of volunteers and private networks to rescue quake victims. Even die-hard cynics were won over by Prime Minister Wen Jiabao's emotional comforting of the survivors.

But heroic rescue efforts will not be able to help the government forever, so it is worth asking what can provide long-term political legitimacy. After all, communism has lost its capacity to inspire the Chinese. So what should replace it?

Most Westerners think the answer is liberal democracy, as did many Chinese liberals in the twentieth century. But there is another answer, which takes the form of the old and venerable tradition of Confucianism, which is being revived by government officials, critical intellectuals, and ordinary citizens.

The opening ceremony of the Olympic games underlined this revival: it featured not quotes from Marx, but sayings from the Analects of Confucius. Such sayings as 'The world's peoples are all brothers' and 'Isn't one of life's greatest pleasures to have friends visiting from afar?' were be beamed to billions worldwide, expressing the best that Chinese culture has to offer.

Here, however, we run into trouble. Ever since the Han dynasty (more than 2,000 years ago), Chinese governments have manipulated the most prominent political interpretations of Confucianism for their own purposes. Confucianism has been combined with Legalism, China's other main political tradition, to justify such practices as blind obedience to the ruler, subordination of women, and the use of harsh punishments. The 'official' Confucianism being revived today may be less dangerous -- it emphasizes social harmony, meaning the peaceful resolution of conflicts -- but it remains a conservative morality.

But there is another interpretation of Confucianism -- let's call it 'left Confucianism' -- that stresses intellectuals' obligation to criticize bad policies, obliges governments to provide for the people's material well-being and support those without key family relations, and calls for governments to adopt a more international-minded outlook and to rely on moral power rather than military might to pursue political aims. It leaves open basic metaphysical commitments and takes a plural and tolerant view of religious life. It emphasizes equality of opportunity in education as well as meritocracy in government, with leadership positions being distributed to the community's most virtuous and qualified members.

Such values owe their origin to the 'original Confucianism' of Confucius, Mencius, and Xunzi, which existed before Confucianism became established as state orthodoxy. In imperial times, the critical tradition was carried forward by such scholars as Huang Zongxi. Today, new Confucian leftists such as Gan Yang are calling for the creation of a 'Confucian socialist republic.'

Confucian scholars such as Jiang Qing openly acknowledge that their interpretation of Confucianism most closely parallels socialist ideals: not the 'actually existing socialism' in today's China, but the socialist ideals defended by Karl Marx and others. This Confucian tradition aims to influence contemporary politics, but it also remains separate from state power and orthodoxy, always ready to point to the gap between ideals and reality.

Indeed, left Confucianism's departure from the status quo is precisely the point: it is meant to provide a moral standard for social critics and to inspire visions of a more desirable political future. Unlike communism, it offers a future that derives its legitimacy from tradition and building upon what the past has to offer -- including the socialist tradition -- rather than destroying it.

Thus, left Confucians favor institutional reform, arguing that the long-term stability and legitimacy of political institutions requires that they be founded on Chinese traditions. Jiang Qing advocates a tri-cameral legislature -- a democratically elected People's House representing the common people's interests, a House of Exemplary Persons to secure the good of all those affected by government policies, including foreigners and minority groups, and a House of Cultural Continuity that would maintain China's various religions and traditions.

Such concrete proposals for political reform inspired by Confucian values can rarely be published in mainland China. In fact, there are fewer constraints imposed on public discussion of liberal-democratic institutions precisely because few Chinese are inspired by Western-style liberal democracy. Today, the most viable alternative to China's political status quo is left Confucianism.

Daniel A. Bell is professor of political theory at Tsinghua University (Beijing). His latest book is China's New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society.

Copyright: Project Syndicate/Institute for Human Sciences, 2008.

www.project-syndicate.org


Wednesday, December 16, 2009

'We respect Confucius, but we do not try to court favour of him'

This is a statement made by Chen Han, one of the writers for the Hu Mei's 2009 version of , in respond to the criticism of their new movie (ready to be released in Jan 2010) mainly from the posterity of Confucius (the Kong's family). (see here for the original article publish on Chen Han's blog, in Chinese)

I'm actually very excited to see this article -- I have this crazy and unorganized thoughts about how this kind of interpretation of Confucius and Confucianism and its 'sacredness' (very different from what I saw in the 1940s version) demonstrate the shift of 'power' of culture interpretation. It's like, 'hey dude, Confucius is cool, but he is not necessary who YOU think who he is!' The reasons why Confucius is a sage to us maybe be different from yours, but that does not we do not respect him.

Highlight from the discourse about the 'sagehood' of Confucius in the film by Chen Han:
  • 'We try to emphasize the humanity of Confucius in the film and avoid too much emphasis on his sageness. Confucius' greatness is based on his human character and contribution to the culture. He is not perfect as a divine being. As our director and Chow Yunfat had came to this shared understanding: no halo' (电影中的孔子尽力去圣而还原为人,他之所以伟大,在其人格和文化上的成就,他不是完美得像神一样毫无瑕疵的。正如导演和周润发公开表示过的共识:不要光环)
  • 'Jesus and Skahyamuni had all been tempted in the wilderness. They overcame the temptation, which at the same time reinforced/ justified their divine nature. Therefore,by illustrating how Nanzi seduces Confucius in the film, we are actually emphasizing the classical chapter that highlights Confucius's sagehood'.(耶稣、释迦牟尼都在荒野上受到了诱惑,他们超越了,所以更显其神性、佛性。其实,写南子诱惑孔子,才是写伟人的经典一章,才更显其为圣者也)
What are the things that the posterity of Confucius upset about in the film (or, to be specific, in the trailer!)?
  1. Since Confucius is historically recognized as the sage for Chinese people....your company should stick with the fact as stated in history and protect the image of Confucius as sage, and should not destory the image of Confcuis as 'the teachers for thousands of generations' for commercial purpose' (一、孔子作为中华民族的圣人地位,是历史公认的。他的事迹和形象,是千百年来历史记载和流传下来的,不容篡改和歪曲。贵方拍摄《孔子》电影,应当尊重历史,尊重史实,维护孔子圣人的形象,不应只顾及商业利益而做出有损于孔子“万世师表”形象的行为。)
  2. Based on the 45-second trail, we suggest the following changes in the film: a) to cut all the dialogue that does not reflect the 'factual' historical background of Confucius. Original quotes and dialogue of Confucius from historical documents and the Analects should be used. (.删除“给个话儿”等明显不符合历史背景和孔子本人形象的话语。尽量采用史书和《论语》中所记载的孔子原话); b) to delete all the conversation between Nanzi and Confucius that are disgraceful, lack of historical support, and destructive to the image of Confucius as the sage (删减孔子与南子的暧昧对白等明显缺乏史实依据并严重有损于孔子圣人形象的内容); c) to delete excessive war and fighting sences that Confucius involved in the filim, instead, emphasize more on Confucius' demeanor as sage and his teaching about kindness and love. (削减片中“孔子”过多的武戏和战争戏,重点突出孔子的仁爱精神与圣人风范
  3. Your company should respond to our request immediately and positively, and halt all other activities that will destroy Confucius' image. Otherwise, we will manipulate all possible legal means to protect the image of Confucius as the sage. (贵方应当对我们提出的改动要求立即做出积极处理,并立即停止其它一切有损于孔子形象的举动。否则,我们将在必要的时候不排除诉诸法律手段,以维护孔子“至圣先师”、“万世师表”的圣人形象)